On 16.6.2016 12:12, Ludwig Krispenz wrote: > > On 06/16/2016 12:00 PM, Petr Spacek wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Require 389-ds-base >= 220.127.116.11 >> >> Old DS handles LDAP filters incorrectly > no. Old DS handles filters strictly as documented in the admin guide, > requiring access rights to each attribute used in the search filter. This was > known and applications had to adapt, in your case there would have had to be > two searches one with the (&()()) filter and one with (|()()()()).
You know, it is quite hard to adapt when your application rely on one SyncRepl session ... Anyway, feel free to send patch with rephrased commit message if you wish, I'm okay with superseding my patch with yours. Petr^2 Spacek > This was improved in the latest version and componets withou access are > ignored in filter evaluation to avoid the problems you did run into. > > otherwise your fix is ok > > Ludwig >> and breaks bind-dyndb-ldap. >> See https://www.redhat.com/archives/freeipa-devel/2016-June/msg00477.html >> >> https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/2008 -- Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-devel mailing list: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel Contribute to FreeIPA: http://www.freeipa.org/page/Contribute/Code