On 16.06.2016 12:21, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
On 06/16/2016 12:14 PM, Petr Spacek wrote:
On 16.6.2016 12:12, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
You know, it is quite hard to adapt when your application rely on one
On 06/16/2016 12:00 PM, Petr Spacek wrote:
Require 389-ds-base >= 18.104.22.168
Old DS handles LDAP filters incorrectly
no. Old DS handles filters strictly as documented in the admin guide,
requiring access rights to each attribute used in the search filter.
known and applications had to adapt, in your case there would have
had to be
two searches one with the (&()()) filter and one with (|()()()()).
Anyway, feel free to send patch with rephrased commit message if you
okay with superseding my patch with yours.
no, it's fine, only sometimes I need to defend DS a bit
This was improved in the latest version and componets withou access are
ignored in filter evaluation to avoid the problems you did run into.
otherwise your fix is ok
and breaks bind-dyndb-ldap.
Pushed to master: 85d083c36651b15457af75e009f83bc6bb8114b0
Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-devel mailing list:
Contribute to FreeIPA: http://www.freeipa.org/page/Contribute/Code