On 16.06.2016 12:21, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:

On 06/16/2016 12:14 PM, Petr Spacek wrote:
On 16.6.2016 12:12, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
On 06/16/2016 12:00 PM, Petr Spacek wrote:

Require 389-ds-base >=

Old DS handles LDAP filters incorrectly
no. Old DS handles filters strictly as documented in the admin guide,
requiring access rights to each attribute used in the search filter. This was known and applications had to adapt, in your case there would have had to be
two searches one with the (&()()) filter and one with (|()()()()).
You know, it is quite hard to adapt when your application rely on one SyncRepl
session ...

Anyway, feel free to send patch with rephrased commit message if you wish, I'm
okay with superseding my patch with yours.
no, it's fine, only sometimes I need to defend DS a bit

Petr^2 Spacek

This was improved in the latest version and componets withou access are
ignored in filter evaluation to avoid the problems you did run into.

otherwise your fix is ok

and breaks bind-dyndb-ldap.
See https://www.redhat.com/archives/freeipa-devel/2016-June/msg00477.html


Pushed to master: 85d083c36651b15457af75e009f83bc6bb8114b0

Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-devel mailing list:
Contribute to FreeIPA: http://www.freeipa.org/page/Contribute/Code

Reply via email to