On 17.6.2016 09:24, Stanislav Laznicka wrote:
> On 06/17/2016 08:48 AM, Petr Spacek wrote:
>> On 17.6.2016 08:43, Stanislav Laznicka wrote:
>>> On 06/17/2016 07:45 AM, Petr Spacek wrote:
>>>> On 16.6.2016 17:33, Stanislav Laznicka wrote:
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>> This patch removes most sys.exits() from installer modules and
>>>>> scripts and
>>>>> replaces them with ScriptError. I only left sys.exits at places
>>>>> where the user
>>>>> decides yes/no on continuation of the script.
>>>> I wonder if yes/no should be replaced with KeyboardInterrupt or some
>>>> other
>>>> exception, too...
>>> I'm not sure, it seems more clear to just really exit if the user
>>> desires it
>>> and it's what we say we'll do (with possible cleanup beforehand). Do
>>> you think
>>> we could benefit somehow by raising an exception here?
>> I'm just thinking out loud.
>> It seemed to me that it is easier to share cleanup on one except block
>> instead
>> of having if (interrupt): cleanup; if (interrupt2): same_cleanup;
>> etc.
>> Again, just wondering out loud.
> If the cleanup is the same, or similar it might be more beneficial to
> have it in a function where you could pass what was set up already and
> therefore needs cleanup. But that's just an opinion coming from thinking
> out loud as well. I went through the code to see if there's much cleanup
> after these user actions and it seems that usually there's nothing much
> if anything. However, thinking in advance may save us much trouble in
> the future, of course.

Btw the original scope of the ticket is to replace sys.exit calls ONLY
in installer modules. Please don't waste time with debugging other use
cases before 4.4 is out.

Petr Vobornik

Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-devel mailing list:
Contribute to FreeIPA: http://www.freeipa.org/page/Contribute/Code

Reply via email to