On 17.6.2016 09:24, Stanislav Laznicka wrote:
> On 06/17/2016 08:48 AM, Petr Spacek wrote:
>> On 17.6.2016 08:43, Stanislav Laznicka wrote:
>>> On 06/17/2016 07:45 AM, Petr Spacek wrote:
>>>> On 16.6.2016 17:33, Stanislav Laznicka wrote:
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>
>>>>> This patch removes most sys.exits() from installer modules and
>>>>> scripts and
>>>>> replaces them with ScriptError. I only left sys.exits at places
>>>>> where the user
>>>>> decides yes/no on continuation of the script.
>>>> I wonder if yes/no should be replaced with KeyboardInterrupt or some
>>>> other
>>>> exception, too...
>>>>
>>> I'm not sure, it seems more clear to just really exit if the user
>>> desires it
>>> and it's what we say we'll do (with possible cleanup beforehand). Do
>>> you think
>>> we could benefit somehow by raising an exception here?
>> I'm just thinking out loud.
>>
>> It seemed to me that it is easier to share cleanup on one except block
>> instead
>> of having if (interrupt): cleanup; if (interrupt2): same_cleanup;
>>
>> etc.
>>
>> Again, just wondering out loud.
>>
> If the cleanup is the same, or similar it might be more beneficial to
> have it in a function where you could pass what was set up already and
> therefore needs cleanup. But that's just an opinion coming from thinking
> out loud as well. I went through the code to see if there's much cleanup
> after these user actions and it seems that usually there's nothing much
> if anything. However, thinking in advance may save us much trouble in
> the future, of course.
> 

Btw the original scope of the ticket is to replace sys.exit calls ONLY
in installer modules. Please don't waste time with debugging other use
cases before 4.4 is out.

-- 
Petr Vobornik

-- 
Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-devel mailing list:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel
Contribute to FreeIPA: http://www.freeipa.org/page/Contribute/Code

Reply via email to