On 30/11/16 16:09, Rob Crittenden wrote:
David Kupka wrote:
On 29/11/16 18:10, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
Still, bug reports and users' complaints is the only external measure we
have. There are close to nothing in complaints about NTP functionality,
other than requests to support chronyd and a better discover of existing
NTP setups. I don't think that requires dramatic action like removal of
NTP support at all.

As Petr already pointed out, since Fedora 16 chronyd is enabled by
default and ipa-client-install doesn't configure time synchronization
when chronyd is enabled.

I believe that majority of users haven't used '--force-ntpd' and since
it still worked they haven't filed any ticket.

IMO in this case no bug reports means no users rather than no bugs or

Unfortunately, this is just my guess and AFAIK we don't have any data
from users showing how they use FreeIPA.

For argument's sake, let's say NTP configuration in the client is
dropped and managed by the OS or other administrators.

What implication does this have for configuring NTP server on masters?
Would that be stopped as well? What about existing installs?

I don't believe there is a precedence for removing a service from IPA.


Well, everything was done for the first time at some point in history.

I would prefer removing it from server too.

I imagine it this way:
0. We agree that NTP as FreeIPA service will be dropped in 4.x
1. We add big fat warning to nearest release (currently 4.5) that FreeIPA will stop supporting NTP as its service on server and client and if NTP was configured by FreeIPA (we can tell from sysrestore) upgrade will revert those changes. 2. New installations of 4.x will not configure NTP on server nor client. Upgrades to 4.x will revert configuration if done by FreeIPA.

I think it's actually that simple. The only hard part is reaching the agreement.

While I understand that the value of FreeIPA is entirely in taking care of non-trivial services and orchestrating them in a way most comfortable for the administrator I think configuring NTP is:
 * reasonably easy (<5 lines on client, <10 lines on server),
* unnecessary in most cases (distributions defaults or DHCP+NetworkManager just work)
and so not worth keeping in FreeIPA.

David Kupka

Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-devel mailing list:
Contribute to FreeIPA: http://www.freeipa.org/page/Contribute/Code

Reply via email to