On Mon, 2017-03-06 at 07:47 +0100, Martin Babinsky wrote:
> On 03/02/2017 02:54 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > On Thu, 2017-03-02 at 08:10 +0100, Martin Babinsky wrote:
> >> In this case it would probably be a good idea to think about "forward
> >> compatibility" and define a new AUX objectclass bringing in
> >> 'ipaDomainResolutionOrder' instead of extending two separate
> >> objectclasses. In this way we may the just extend whathever object we
> >> desire to carry the override in an easy and clean way.
> > I agree.
> > Simo.
> Now the most difficult question remains... How to name this objectclass.
> I personally am out of ideas but will try my best to come up with
> something meaningful.
Try to describe what the option ultimately does with as few words as
Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York
Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-devel mailing list:
Contribute to FreeIPA: http://www.freeipa.org/page/Contribute/Code