Thanks Alexander for such a nice explanation.
I've a follow-up thing to ask , i understood your point that if i'm using
primary domain and realm as "avtar.test" then .stg.avtar.test and
.testing.stg.avtar.test are two DNS zones nested within avtar.test. and the
integrated DNS in IPA master doesnt know anything about the sub-domains hence
it is unable to resolve hostname "testing-infra-01-dal13.testing.stg.avtar.test"
But if i install Bind DNS server separately and configure "zone" as below
well in this case BIND server is able to provide resolution for server
"testing-infra-01-dal13.testing.stg.avtar.test" as its configured as "A record"
in "/etc/bind/avtar.test" file.
Please help in understand this variation in behaviour of Bind Server VS IDM
integrated DNS. I mean is it something that BIND server can do resolution of
its child domains implicitly whereas that is something not supported by IDM
integrated DNS . Why there is not need in BIND server to configure sub domains
of "avtar.test" domain.
Kindly help.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
zone "avtar.test" IN {
type master;
file "/etc/bind/avtar.test";
};
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
_______________________________________________
FreeIPA-users mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/[email protected]
