Thanks Flo

This could be it.
So far all newly created DNS entries show up on the updated server.
Fingers crossed.
-- Kees

On 08-07-2021 17:57, Florence Renaud wrote:
Hi,
There were a few known issues with 389-ds and sync_repl. I see your version of 389-ds is 1.4.3.16-8.module_el8.4.0 but 389-ds-base-1.4.3.23-2.module_el8.5.0+835+5d54734c.x86_64.rpm <http://mirror.centos.org/centos/8-stream/AppStream/x86_64/os/Packages/389-ds-base-1.4.3.23-2.module_el8.5.0+835+5d54734c.x86_64.rpm> is already available, maybe worth trying the latest packages.

flo

On Thu, Jul 8, 2021 at 3:32 PM Kees Bakker <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    I now have a debugger attached and I can print some values
    in ldap_entry_reconstruct and mldap_entry_read.

    Breakpoint 1 is at the if in
             result = mldap_entry_read(mldap, uuid, &node);
             if (result != ISC_R_SUCCESS) {

    Breakpoint 2 is at
             return metadb_readnode_open(mldap->mdb, &mname, nodep);


    It appears that I'm getting ISC_R_NOTFOUND (23)

    Thread 8 "isc-worker0000" hit Breakpoint 2, mldap_entry_read
    (mldap=mldap@entry=0x7f3299a27490,
         uuid=uuid@entry=0x7f32843cd520,
    nodep=nodep@entry=0x7f32843cd430)
    at mldap.c:395
    395        return metadb_readnode_open(mldap->mdb, &mname, nodep);
    $8 = {magic = 1145983854, ndata = 0x7f32843cd2d0
    "$6af6dc17-dfe5-11eb-8275-90e8ab7c8ee8\004uuid\004ldap",
       length = 48, labels = 4, attributes = 1, offsets = 0x0, buffer =
    0x7f32843cd240, link = {
         prev = 0xffffffffffffffff, next = 0xffffffffffffffff}, list =
    {head
    = 0x0, tail = 0x0}}

    Thread 8 "isc-worker0000" hit Breakpoint 1, ldap_entry_reconstruct
    (mctx=0x555f921047d0,
         mldap=0x7f3299a27490, uuid=uuid@entry=0x7f32843cd520,
    entryp=entryp@entry=0x7f32843cd4a0)
         at ldap_entry.c:148
    148        if (result != ISC_R_SUCCESS) {
    $9 = {bv_len = 16,
       bv_val = 0x7f327d032199
    "j\366\334\027\337\345\021\353\202u\220\350\253|\216", <incomplete
    sequence \350>}
    $10 = 23
    $11 = (metadb_node_t *) 0x0

    What can I do next?

    On 01-07-2021 10:24, Kees Bakker via FreeIPA-users wrote:
    > Hey,
    >
    > In two of my three masters I see these error messages.
    >
    > Jul 01 09:38:38 linge.ghs.nl <http://linge.ghs.nl>
    named-pkcs11[6945]: bug in
    > ldap_entry_reconstruct(): protocol violation: attempt to reconstruct
    > non-existing entry
    > Jul 01 09:38:38 linge.ghs.nl <http://linge.ghs.nl>
    named-pkcs11[6945]: ldap_sync_search_entry
    > failed: not found
    >
    > It also so happens that DNS is not updated on these two systems.
    > We only use one master to update DNS, either via the web interface
    > or via DHCP-update. These changes are correctly found in LDAP, on
    > all three systems. However, the two other nameservers don't pick
    > up the changes.
    >
    > There are no "syncrepl_update" messages in the log (after increasing
    > trace level with rndc trace 10).
    >
    > To be honest, I don't know if the above errors are related to
    the missing
    > updates. I'm grasping at straws here.
    > Something is seriously wrong, but what? How can I debug this
    further?
    >
    > The two failing systems run CentOS 8 Stream. Some rpm info:
    > 389-ds-base-1.4.3.16-8.module_el8.4.0+644+ed25d39e.x86_64
    > ipa-server-4.9.2-3.module_el8.5.0+750+c59b186b.x86_64
    > --
    > Kees
    > _______________________________________________
    > FreeIPA-users mailing list --
    [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>
    > To unsubscribe send an email to
    > [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>
    > Fedora Code of Conduct:
    > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
    <https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/>
    > List Guidelines:
    https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
    <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines>
    > List Archives:
    >
    
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/[email protected]
    
<https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/[email protected]>
    > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
    > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
    <https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure>


_______________________________________________
FreeIPA-users mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Reply via email to