Hi Attila, Attila Bogár wrote: > I would like to deploy an integrated Samba4 / FreeIPA environment. > I would like to enquire, what's the current status of FreeIPA 1.9.0.pre4 and > Samba4 integration.
The integration plan that I was involved with was between IPA v3 and Samba 4. But this plan has been deferred in favor of an alternative design using Samba 3. > I've tried http://freeipa.org/page/Samba_4_Configuration a month ago, though > the ldap provision > didn't seem to work. I've even raised a bug at Samba > https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7530 > - which is still open. Yes, this is taking too long to resolve. Unfortunately the last time I tested this there was a problem in Samba 4 that was affecting other LDAP backends as well, not just specific to 389 DS. Samba 4 code is changing a lot so it's rather difficult for me to keep up with the changes especially if it happens in the core code. I plan to continue the investigation as soon as I get the chance. I'll let the others respond to the following questions: > If the Fedora-DS backed Samba4 isn't ready for production at this time, > I would be interested in the pro/contra views of > - deploying a separate Samba4 instance with filesystem backend > - writing a password syncing plugin for Samba4 vs. 389-ds > based on the docs at http://directory.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Plugins > - other paths achieving integration? Thanks. -- Endi S. Dewata _______________________________________________ Freeipa-users mailing list Freeipafirstname.lastname@example.org https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-users