On Thu, 17 Nov 2011, John Dennis wrote: > >>https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728598 > >> > >>It's filed against Red Hat Certificate System in RHEL, not dogtag in > >>Fedora. Adam do you want to clone it into Fedora? > >I'll add symlinks update into freeipa F15->F16 upgrade script. At > >worst, if 728598 will be fixed in Fedora as well, that part of the > >code will do nothing. > > > >Tickets 2103 and 2117 in upstream FreeIPA are for tracking that. > > Just one thing to be careful of, you want to make sure the link > points to the preferred entry in the filesystem. What do I mean by > that? There are unversioned names in /lib which are links to the > versioned entry, the preferred name is the unversioned link name. > There may be similar redirection occurring for mulit-lib, see below. > > Where am I going with this? A few months ago there was a lot of back > and forth discussion over where and how jni jars (those which have > arch specific components) would be named and located to accmodate > multi-lib. I don't recall how the Fedora java-sig folks finally > resolved this issue, mharmsen (Matt) would probably know as he > responsible for the packaging of these components and is the person > who moved them, the aforementioned bz is also assigned to Matt. Understood. Thanks for the explanation, will take that into account. -- / Alexander Bokovoy
_______________________________________________ Freeipa-users mailing list Freeipa-users@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-users