On Thu, 17 Nov 2011, John Dennis wrote:
> >>https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728598
> >>
> >>It's filed against Red Hat Certificate System in RHEL, not dogtag in
> >>Fedora. Adam do you want to clone it into Fedora?
> >I'll add symlinks update into freeipa F15->F16 upgrade script. At
> >worst, if 728598 will be fixed in Fedora as well, that part of the
> >code will do nothing.
> >
> >Tickets 2103 and 2117 in upstream FreeIPA are for tracking that.
> Just one thing to be careful of, you want to make sure the link
> points to the preferred entry in the filesystem. What do I mean by
> that? There are unversioned names in /lib which are links to the
> versioned entry, the preferred name is the unversioned link name.
> There may be similar redirection occurring for mulit-lib, see below.
> Where am I going with this? A few months ago there was a lot of back
> and forth discussion over where and how jni jars (those which have
> arch specific components) would be named and located to accmodate
> multi-lib. I don't recall how the Fedora java-sig folks finally
> resolved this issue, mharmsen (Matt) would probably know as he
> responsible for the packaging of these components and is the person
> who moved them, the aforementioned bz is also assigned to Matt.
Understood. Thanks for the explanation, will take that into account.
/ Alexander Bokovoy

Freeipa-users mailing list

Reply via email to