On 07/23/2012 06:32 PM, Steven Jones wrote:
Hi,
No not specific developers but some sort of statement of ownership from RedHat
I suppose. So they are I assume looking for some sort of confidence that it
wont trash AD and if I install it and it does trash our AD some liability.
Can you point me at another open source project that provides Windows
binaries that provides some sort of guarantee or statement or
documentation like this? I'd like to see what other projects do and
provide something similar.
Or is this the first (and only?) time anyone in your organization has
ever installed any open source software on Windows?
regards
Steven Jones
Technical Specialist - Linux RHCE
Victoria University, Wellington, NZ
0064 4 463 6272
________________________________________
From: Rich Megginson [rmegg...@redhat.com]
Sent: Tuesday, 24 July 2012 12:11 p.m.
To: Steven Jones
Cc: freeipa-users@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Freeipa-users] winsync msi
On 07/23/2012 05:38 PM, Steven Jones wrote:
Hi,
For the winsync agreement my Windows and security teams want to know its
details,
eg who wrote it,
Red Hat - do you need to know the names of the developers?
it is Microsoft certified etc.
Not that I know of - how would one go about doing that?
Where will I find such info?
All I have is
http://port389.org/wiki/Download
Which doesn't tell me much.
There is more info in the actual .msi file.
regards
Steven Jones
Technical Specialist - Linux RHCE
Victoria University, Wellington, NZ
0064 4 463 6272
_______________________________________________
Freeipa-users mailing list
Freeipa-users@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-users
_______________________________________________
Freeipa-users mailing list
Freeipa-users@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-users
_______________________________________________
Freeipa-users mailing list
Freeipa-users@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-users
