On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 09:26:40AM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote: > On Fri, 2013-05-31 at 11:55 +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote: > > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 07:23:38PM -0400, Dmitri Pal wrote: > > > On 05/30/2013 06:52 PM, Chandan Kumar wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > As part of migration from passwd/shadow to IPA, I want to roll out > > > > IPA/SSSD based password first for a small number of users and then for > > > > all. (same goes with host. first small number of host and then all). > > > > > > > > I was trying to limit it using max_id/min_id parameters in sssd but it > > > > does not seems to work the way I expected. > > > > ------- > > > > min_id = 5000 > > > > max_id = 5100 > > > > ------ > > > > So there is a user "kchandan" with UID/GID 20000 > > > > ------ > > > > [root@tipa1 ~]# id kchandan > > > > uid=20000(kchandan) gid=20000 groups=20000 > > > > ------- > > > > > > > > But It is allowing me to login with that ID with only error showing > > > > GID 20000 not found. > > > > ----------- > > > > ssh 10.2.3.105 -l kchandan > > > > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>'s password: > > > > id: cannot find name for group ID 20000 > > > > ------------- > > > > > > > > Is there any way to achieve this? > > > > > > So you want to allow only a subset of users with a specific range to log > > > into the systems controlled by SSSD before you open it to a broader > > > public? > > > I would defer to SSSD gurus but the hack that comes to mind is to > > > configure a simple access provider to limit the access to just the users > > > you care about (man sssd-simple) or configure ldap access provider based > > > on a filter (man sssd-ldap). > > > > Hi, > > > > The user shouldn't be even saved to cache if it's filtered out of range. > > > > But looking at the current NSS code, the entry would have been returned if > > it was saved *before* you changed the min_id/max_id parameters. Could that > > be > > the case? Can you check if after removing the cache the entry still shows > > up? > > > > I think that the fact that the entry is returned from cache even if it > > should be filtered out is a bug: > > https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/1954 > > So far we always maintained that if you consistently change > configuration (and a change of ranges is a big change) then it's on the > admin to wipe the cache file.
Yes, that's why the ticket is minor. But mostly I don't like the inconsistency where some requests check the ranges even in the responder and some don't. _______________________________________________ Freeipa-users mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-users
