On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 10:17:44PM -0500, Dmitri Pal wrote: > On 11/07/2013 06:20 PM, Dean Hunter wrote: > > On Thu, 2013-11-07 at 17:41 -0500, Dmitri Pal wrote: > >> On 11/07/2013 12:59 PM, Dean Hunter wrote: > >>> On Thu, 2013-11-07 at 12:36 -0500, Dmitri Pal wrote: > >>>> On 11/07/2013 12:21 PM, Dean Hunter wrote: > >>>>> On Thu, 2013-11-07 at 09:44 +0200, Alexander Bokovoy wrote: > >>>>>> On Wed, 06 Nov 2013, Dean Hunter wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> >After building a new VM and configuring the IPA 3.3.2 client, Gnome > >>>>>> >seems to only perform a local log-in until the system is rebooted. SSH > >>>>>> >works with IPA, but not Gnome. Is this correct? Is there anything less > >>>>>> >disruptive than a reboot that I can do? > >>>>> > >>>>>> Restart gdm.service? > >>>>>> I'm not sure how gdm handles PAM auth. > >>>>> > >>>>> I have tried: > >>>>> > >>>>> ipa-client-install ... > >>>>> systemctl restart gdm.service > >>>>> > >>>>> but the behavior remains the same. The Gnome log in screen accepts > >>>>> the user name, pauses about 25 seconds, then displays the log in > >>>>> screen again without any messages or indication of a problem. This > >>>>> is the same behavior I see when entering an incorrect local user > >>>>> name before configuring IPA. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>> Freeipa-users mailing list > >>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > >>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-users > >>>> Can it be a DIR cache issue and the fact that the directory can't > >>>> is not created at proper time? > >>> > >>> Which directory, please? > >> > >> If you are hitting the DIR cache issue (which I am not sure is the > >> case this is why I asked about AVCs) then the directory we are > >> talking about is /var/run/usr/<uid> > >> This directory should be created by kerberos library when it tries to > >> authenticate a user. But it might not be able to since a parent > >> directory /var/run/usr might not be created yet. This is one of the > >> reasons why we decided not to continue the path of DIR cache but > >> switched to using Kernel based ccache. > >> > >> > >>> > >>>> Do you see any AVCs? > >> > >> Question still stands. > > > > I see no AVCs: > > > > [root@ipa <mailto:root@ipa> ~]# ausearch --message AVC > > <no matches> > > [root@ipa <mailto:root@ipa> ~]# > > > > I did find this in the man page for nsswitch.conf: > > > > FILES > > A service named SERVICE is implemented by a shared object > > library named > > libnss_SERVICE.so.X that resides in /lib. > > > > /etc/nsswitch.conf NSS configuration file. > > /lib/libnss_compat.so.X implements "compat" source. > > /lib/libnss_db.so.X implements "db" source. > > /lib/libnss_dns.so.X implements "dns" source. > > /lib/libnss_files.so.X implements "files" source. > > /lib/libnss_hesiod.so.X implements "hesiod" source. > > /lib/libnss_nis.so.X implements "nis" source. > > /lib/libnss_nisplus.so.X implements "nisplus" source. > > > > NOTES > > Within each process that uses nsswitch.conf, the entire > > file is read > > only once. If the file is later changed, the process > > will continue > > using the old configuration. > > > > > > Is this why the default configuration of nsswitch.conf is changing in > > Fedora 20, as noted on of the preceeding e-mails? > > > > > Yes I think SSS is now included by default.
Yes, starting with F-20. > But if man page does not > list it it is probably a bug in the man page. I think the man page only lists modules that are shipped with the glibc RPM, not any 3rd party modules like nss_ldap or nss_sss. _______________________________________________ Freeipa-users mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-users
