On Tue, 2015-03-31 at 13:54 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote: > On Tue, 2015-03-31 at 13:50 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote: > > But IPA is more complex and some operations will be performed directly > > against the specific server name, so you need to keep 2 sets of keys > > (one for the server name and one for the load balancer name), but that > > does not work right now. > > One experiment that can be done is to remove all "per-server" HTTP > services for the IPA server, and instead add their name as aliases on > the common load-balancer name. > > This would mean that all IPA servers would have just one key in their > HTTP keytab, but the KDC would release tickets readable by that key for > any name the clients may ask for. > > It is a bit tricky, every time you build a replica you want to > load-balance you'll have to go back and remove the service and switch > keytabs, but it may be an option. Of course if you brick IPA then you > get to keep the pieces :-) > > Simo. >
careful there, as kerberos balks at CNAME records. i think you need to use A records. i ran into a couple odd issues and decided to only use A/PTR records for my stuff and never went "exploring" for options/alternatives. -- Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-users mailing list: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-users Go to http://freeipa.org for more info on the project
