Brendan Kearney wrote: > On Tue, 2015-03-31 at 13:54 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote: >> On Tue, 2015-03-31 at 13:50 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote: >>> But IPA is more complex and some operations will be performed directly >>> against the specific server name, so you need to keep 2 sets of keys >>> (one for the server name and one for the load balancer name), but that >>> does not work right now. >> >> One experiment that can be done is to remove all "per-server" HTTP >> services for the IPA server, and instead add their name as aliases on >> the common load-balancer name. >> >> This would mean that all IPA servers would have just one key in their >> HTTP keytab, but the KDC would release tickets readable by that key for >> any name the clients may ask for. >> >> It is a bit tricky, every time you build a replica you want to >> load-balance you'll have to go back and remove the service and switch >> keytabs, but it may be an option. Of course if you brick IPA then you >> get to keep the pieces :-) >> >> Simo. >> > > careful there, as kerberos balks at CNAME records. i think you need to > use A records. i ran into a couple odd issues and decided to only use > A/PTR records for my stuff and never went "exploring" for > options/alternatives. >
Not DNS aliases, Kerberos principal alises. rob -- Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-users mailing list: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-users Go to http://freeipa.org for more info on the project
