> On Apr 13, 2015, at 1:33 PM, Martin Kosek <mko...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On 04/12/2015 05:27 AM, Brian Topping wrote: >> Hi all, trying to figure out if I may have contaminated my ACIs in the >> process of upgrading my replicated deployment. I didn't upgrade the >> instances at the same time, is there any possibility that the 3.x ACIs >> contaminated the 4.x DIT? > > What do you mean, by... contaminated? Can you please described what exactly > happened? > > As Dmitri said, there were major ACI related changes in 4.0, but I am not sure > what is the problem in your case.
The only thing that is broken at the moment is my OCD. I did make a couple of changes in my 3.x deployment that appear to have been insufficient when I upgraded, but I didn't name them well and I'm having issues trying to find which ones they were. Now that I've RTFM on ACIs, I want to make sure everything that is there is there for a reason. I'd rather put effort in now than be surprised by some cruft I left behind in a future upgrade. >> If so, how would I check it? Is there an LDIF in the disto that I can >> manually compare the entries? > > I am not sure which entries are you referring to. But from 4.0, most of the > ACIs are now generated dynamically, from Python code. If the schema/ACIs are managed by Python, it might be interesting for the script to generate warnings when it runs. Stuff like missing/extra schema & ACIs. Just a thought.
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
-- Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-users mailing list: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-users Go to http://freeipa.org for more info on the project