On 06/17/2015 11:52 AM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:

On 06/17/2015 11:45 AM, thierry bordaz wrote:

On 06/17/2015 11:22 AM, Alexander Frolushkin wrote:

This was a usual "ipa-replica-install --setup-ca --setup-dns" and after that ipa-adtrust-install.

No DEL found:

# grep "cn=System: Manage Host Keytab,cn=permissions,cn=pbac,dc=unix,dc=megafon,dc=ru" ./access

[17/Jun/2015:10:08:01 +0600] conn=2 op=89 SRCH base="cn=System: Manage Host Keytab,cn=permissions,cn=pbac,dc=unix,dc=megafon,dc=ru" scope=0 filter="(objectClass=*)" attrs="ipaPermRight ipaPermTargetFilter ipaPermBindRuleType ipaPermissionType cn objectClass memberOf member ipaPermTarget ipaPermDefaultAttr ipaPermLocation ipaPermIncludedAttr ipaPermExcludedAttr"

[17/Jun/2015:10:08:01 +0600] conn=2 op=91 ADD dn="cn=System: Manage Host Keytab,cn=permissions,cn=pbac,dc=unix,dc=megafon,dc=ru"


There is something I miss. conn=2 op=91 was a direct update on replica26 (not replicated) because it received its own CSN=5580f3210000001a0000. But it created a conflict entry, so at that time it existed the same entry (the one created 20150408070720Z) . So the direct update should have been rejected.
I think the search in op=89 did not return an entry, so it was added in op 91, that seems to be ok, but then 4 hrs later there is conn=237 adding it again.

Alexander,

could you get the complete 'conn=237 op=93' and also the start of conn 293, to show where teh connection comes from
of course conn=237

Would you check if the replicaID=26 is unique in the topology (list-ruv for example) ?

[17/Jun/2015:14:39:46 +0600] conn=237 op=93 ADD dn="cn=System: Manage Host Keytab,cn=permissions,cn=pbac,dc=unix,dc=megafon,dc=ru"

It is also possible this entry on affected servers was previously duplicated and not correctly managed to delete (more recent dup was deleted).

Is there any natural way to fix such issues? Maybe ipa-replica-manage force-sync, or ipa-replica-manage re-initialize on affected site servers from normal servers could help?

WBR,

Alexander Frolushkin

Cell +79232508764

Work +79232507764

*From:*thierry bordaz [mailto:tbor...@redhat.com]
*Sent:* Wednesday, June 17, 2015 3:15 PM
*To:* Alexander Frolushkin (SIB)
*Cc:* 'Ludwig Krispenz'; freeipa-users@redhat.com
*Subject:* Re: [Freeipa-users] replication conflicts

Hello Alexander,

How did you initialize that new replica 26.
Either 'cn=System: Manage Host Keytab,cn=permissions,cn=pbac,dc=unix,dc=megafon,dc=ru' was not part of the total init data, or a DEL of that entry happened on replica 26 (before a new ADD) but the DEL was not replicated to replica12.
Would you check in replica26 access logs if that entry was deleted ?

thanks
theirry

On 06/17/2015 11:03 AM, Alexander Frolushkin wrote:

    This is correct, thank you for understanding and for helping!

    Replica with id 26 was created today, this is our new server
    which was included in domain just a few hours ago. Looks like
    this dup came right after this new replica creation.

    WBR,

    Alexander Frolushkin

    Cell +79232508764

    Work +79232507764

    *From:*Ludwig Krispenz [mailto:lkris...@redhat.com]
    *Sent:* Wednesday, June 17, 2015 2:58 PM
    *To:* Alexander Frolushkin (SIB)
    *Cc:* freeipa-users@redhat.com <mailto:freeipa-users@redhat.com>
    *Subject:* Re: [Freeipa-users] replication conflicts

    Hi,

    you did send the data directly to me, maybe not wanting to share
    them to everyone. I'll continue discussion here, trying to be
    careful.

    The "good" entry was created in April on replica 12 "0x0c"
    createTimestamp;vucsn-5524d42b0067000c0000: 20150408070720Z

    the "nsuniqueid" entry was created today on replica 26 "0x1a"
    createTimestamp;vucsn-5580f3210000001a0000: 20150617040801Z

    if the original entry would have existed on replica26 the new
    add should have been rejected, if it was not there the question
    is why.

    Do you have any additional info on replica 26, when was it
    created, was it disconnected for some time ??

    Ludwig

    On 06/17/2015 08:13 AM, Alexander Frolushkin wrote:

        Hello.

        Another example. Today appeared on servers of different site.

        Original LDIF:

        # extended LDIF

        #

        # LDAPv3

        # base <cn=System: Manage Host
        Keytab,cn=permissions,cn=pbac,dc=unix,dc=megafon,dc=ru> with
        scope subtree

        # filter: (objectclass=*)

        # requesting: ALL

        #

        # System: Manage Host Keytab, permissions, pbac, unix.megafon.ru

        dn: cn=System: Manage Host
        Keytab,cn=permissions,cn=pbac,dc=unix,dc=megafon,dc

        =ru

        ipaPermTargetFilter: (objectclass=ipahost)

        ipaPermRight: write

        ipaPermBindRuleType: permission

        ipaPermissionType: V2

        ipaPermissionType: MANAGED

        ipaPermissionType: SYSTEM

        cn: System: Manage Host Keytab

        objectClass: ipapermission

        objectClass: top

        objectClass: groupofnames

        objectClass: ipapermissionv2

        member: cn=Host
        Enrollment,cn=privileges,cn=pbac,dc=unix,dc=megafon,dc=ru

        member: cn=Host
        Administrators,cn=privileges,cn=pbac,dc=unix,dc=megafon,dc=ru

        ipaPermDefaultAttr: krbprincipalkey

        ipaPermDefaultAttr: krblastpwdchange

        ipaPermLocation:
        cn=computers,cn=accounts,dc=unix,dc=megafon,dc=ru

        # search result

        search: 2

        result: 0 Success

        # numResponses: 2

        # numEntries: 1

        Duplicate:

        # extended LDIF

        #

        # LDAPv3

        # base <cn=System: Manage Host
        
Keytab+nsuniqueid=708bba65-14a611e5-8a48fd19-df27ff01,cn=permissions,cn=pbac,dc=unix,dc=megafon,dc=ru>
        with scope subtree

        # filter: (objectclass=*)

        # requesting: ALL

        #

        # System: Manage Host Keytab +
        708bba65-14a611e5-8a48fd19-df27ff01, permissio

        ns, pbac, unix.megafon.ru

        dn: cn=System: Manage Host
        Keytab+nsuniqueid=708bba65-14a611e5-8a48fd19-df27ff

        01,cn=permissions,cn=pbac,dc=unix,dc=megafon,dc=ru

        ipaPermTargetFilter: (objectclass=ipahost)

        ipaPermRight: write

        ipaPermBindRuleType: permission

        ipaPermissionType: V2

        ipaPermissionType: MANAGED

        ipaPermissionType: SYSTEM

        cn: System: Manage Host Keytab

        objectClass: ipapermission

        objectClass: top

        objectClass: groupofnames

        objectClass: ipapermissionv2

        member: cn=Host
        Enrollment,cn=privileges,cn=pbac,dc=unix,dc=megafon,dc=ru

        member: cn=Host
        Administrators,cn=privileges,cn=pbac,dc=unix,dc=megafon,dc=ru

        ipaPermDefaultAttr: krbprincipalkey

        ipaPermDefaultAttr: krblastpwdchange

        ipaPermLocation:
        cn=computers,cn=accounts,dc=unix,dc=megafon,dc=ru

        # search result

        search: 2

        result: 0 Success

        # numResponses: 2

        # numEntries: 1

        No other servers in IPA domain have such duplicates.

        WBR,

        Alexander Frolushkin

        Cell +79232508764

        Work +79232507764

        *From:*freeipa-users-boun...@redhat.com
        <mailto:freeipa-users-boun...@redhat.com>
        [mailto:freeipa-users-boun...@redhat.com] *On Behalf Of
        *Ludwig Krispenz
        *Sent:* Tuesday, June 16, 2015 3:52 PM
        *To:* freeipa-users@redhat.com <mailto:freeipa-users@redhat.com>
        *Subject:* Re: [Freeipa-users] replication conflicts

        On 06/16/2015 11:42 AM, Alexander Frolushkin wrote:

            Hello.

            Just to remind if somebody still not familiar with our
            IPA installation J

            We currently have 18 IPA servers in domain, on 8 sites
            in different regions across the Russia.

            And now, our new problem.

            Regularly we getting a nsds5ReplConflict records on some
            of our servers, very often on servers from specific
            site. Usually it is simply a doubles and we can remove
            the renamed change to get everything back. But why do we
            have them at all?

            May be someone could explain, how we can detect the
            cause of this replication conflicts?

        if you are talking about having two "duplicate" entries,
        one: uid=xxxxx,<suffix>
        one: nsuniqueid=nnnnnnnn+uid=xxxxx,<suffix>

        these entries appear if the entry uid=xxxxx was added,
        simultaneously, on two servers. I think this can happen if a
        client tries to add an entry and if it doesn't get a
        response in some time retries on another server.
        to find out which client this is you need to check on which
        servers the entries were originally added and then see which
        client was doing it



        Sometime it is moderately harmful, because, for example HBAC
        stops working on specific server while doubles still present.

        Thanks in forward...

        WBR,

        Alexander Frolushkin

        Cell +79232508764

        Work +79232507764

        ------------------------------------------------------------------------


        ?????????? ? ???? ????????? ????????????? ????????????? ???
        ?????????? ???, ??????? ??? ??????????. ? ????????? ?????
        ??????????? ???????????????? ??????????, ??????? ?? ?????
        ???? ???????? ??? ???????????? ???-????, ????? ?????????.
        ???? ?? ?? ??????? ????? ?????????, ?? ?????????????,
        ?????????????, ??????????? ??? ??????????????? ??????????
        ????????? ??? ??? ????? ????????? ? ?????????. ???? ??
        ???????? ??? ????????? ????????, ??????????, ???????????????
        ???????? ??????????? ?? ???? ? ??????? ?? ???? ??????????
        ???? ????????? ? ????? ????????? ??? ????? ? ??????????.

        The information contained in this communication is intended
        solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is
        addressed and others authorized to receive it. It may
        contain confidential or legally privileged information. The
        contents may not be disclosed or used by anyone other than
        the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient(s), any
        use, disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken
        or omitted to be taken in reliance on it is prohibited and
        may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in
        error please notify us immediately by responding to this
        email and then delete the e-mail and all attachments and any
        copies thereof.

        (c)20mf50




        ------------------------------------------------------------------------


        ?????????? ? ???? ????????? ????????????? ????????????? ???
        ?????????? ???, ??????? ??? ??????????. ? ????????? ?????
        ??????????? ???????????????? ??????????, ??????? ?? ?????
        ???? ???????? ??? ???????????? ???-????, ????? ?????????.
        ???? ?? ?? ??????? ????? ?????????, ?? ?????????????,
        ?????????????, ??????????? ??? ??????????????? ??????????
        ????????? ??? ??? ????? ????????? ? ?????????. ???? ??
        ???????? ??? ????????? ????????, ??????????, ???????????????
        ???????? ??????????? ?? ???? ? ??????? ?? ???? ??????????
        ???? ????????? ? ????? ????????? ??? ????? ? ??????????.

        The information contained in this communication is intended
        solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is
        addressed and others authorized to receive it. It may
        contain confidential or legally privileged information. The
        contents may not be disclosed or used by anyone other than
        the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient(s), any
        use, disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken
        or omitted to be taken in reliance on it is prohibited and
        may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in
        error please notify us immediately by responding to this
        email and then delete the e-mail and all attachments and any
        copies thereof.

        (c)20mf50

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------


    ?????????? ? ???? ????????? ????????????? ????????????? ???
    ?????????? ???, ??????? ??? ??????????. ? ????????? ?????
    ??????????? ???????????????? ??????????, ??????? ?? ????? ????
    ???????? ??? ???????????? ???-????, ????? ?????????. ???? ?? ??
    ??????? ????? ?????????, ?? ?????????????, ?????????????,
    ??????????? ??? ??????????????? ?????????? ????????? ??? ???
    ????? ????????? ? ?????????. ???? ?? ???????? ??? ?????????
    ????????, ??????????, ??????????????? ???????? ??????????? ??
    ???? ? ??????? ?? ???? ?????????? ???? ????????? ? ?????
    ????????? ??? ????? ? ??????????.

    The information contained in this communication is intended
    solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is
    addressed and others authorized to receive it. It may contain
    confidential or legally privileged information. The contents may
    not be disclosed or used by anyone other than the addressee. If
    you are not the intended recipient(s), any use, disclosure,
    copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken
    in reliance on it is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have
    received this communication in error please notify us
    immediately by responding to this email and then delete the
    e-mail and all attachments and any copies thereof.

    (c)20mf50



------------------------------------------------------------------------

?????????? ? ???? ????????? ????????????? ????????????? ??? ?????????? ???, ??????? ??? ??????????. ? ????????? ????? ??????????? ???????????????? ??????????, ??????? ?? ????? ???? ???????? ??? ???????????? ???-????, ????? ?????????. ???? ?? ?? ??????? ????? ?????????, ?? ?????????????, ?????????????, ??????????? ??? ??????????????? ?????????? ????????? ??? ??? ????? ????????? ? ?????????. ???? ?? ???????? ??? ????????? ????????, ??????????, ??????????????? ???????? ??????????? ?? ???? ? ??????? ?? ???? ?????????? ???? ????????? ? ????? ????????? ??? ????? ? ??????????.

The information contained in this communication is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and others authorized to receive it. It may contain confidential or legally privileged information. The contents may not be disclosed or used by anyone other than the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient(s), any use, disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error please notify us immediately by responding to this email and then delete the e-mail and all attachments and any copies thereof.

(c)20mf50





-- 
Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-users mailing list:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-users
Go to http://freeipa.org for more info on the project

Reply via email to