On 25/11/16 07:52, Martin Babinsky wrote:
On 11/24/2016 07:30 PM, lejeczek wrote:
On 24/11/16 17:14, lejeczek wrote:
hi
I see this:
2 ranges matched
----------------
Range name: xx.id_range
First Posix ID of the range: 1952400000
Number of IDs in the range: 200000
First RID of the corresponding RID range: 0
Domain SID of the trusted domain:
S-1-5-21-1144915091-2252175215-702530032
Range type: Active Directory domain range
Range name: xx.xx.xx.xx.x_id_range
First Posix ID of the range: 1875000000
Number of IDs in the range: 200000
First RID of the corresponding RID range: 1000
First RID of the secondary RID range: 100000000
Range type: local domain range
----------------------------
Number of entries returned 2
some time ago when I first set up IPA I migrated users
from samba3's
ldap backend. Since then until today there was no new
users I needed
to add but now I do.
First on the list range I think it is a remnant of AD
trust which does
not exists any more (should it be removed?).
I'm not sure how to read those ranges info, one thing I
notice is that
UIDs from migration are probably between 500 & 2000 and
now if I
supply uid manually to user-add and gid (which is old
Samba's domain
users group) then creation of new user succeeds.
Is this normal, expected?
mthx,
L
ok, solution(ldapmodify) to the problem:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/freeipa-users/2014-February/msg00246.html
but could some experts shed more light on it - I see that
some time
ago(after migration/import) I actually created manually a
user:
$ id netdevadmin
uid=1875000006(netdevadmin) gid=1875000006(netdevadmin)
groups=1875000006(netdevadmin)
today, after ldapmodify I create a new user but uids seem
to come from
(what?) a different range??
$ id appmgr
uid=3501(appmgr) gid=3501(appmgr) groups=3501(appmgr)
what's is happening?
regards
L
You are seeing this because you probably set s too low
(5000 or so) and, as tha name of the attribute implies, it
sets the maximum UID/GID for the range assigned by the
plugin.
By default, the local IPA ID ranges are set to huge
numbers (on my test VMs I have dnaMaxValue 241799999) to
aviod collisions with UIDs/GIDs of local users which are
typically in the range of thousands/tens of thousands).
However, the changes done directly in the DNA plugin
configuration are not reflected in ID range objects,
that's why you may observe the disparity between ID range
characteristics and actual UIDs/GIDs provisioned.
can you guess what changed those dnaMaxValue after initial
setup/installation (soon after I created
1875000006(netdevadmin), UID was assigned by IPA)? It
certainly was not me.
Should I worry about these disparities? Should I be setting
dnaMaxValue(and any relavent) to correspond to idrange(s)?
Lastly, I see my IPA has two ranges, one is from AD trust
which has been removed, is it ok to leave/keep that range?
mthx,
L.
--
Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-users mailing list:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-users
Go to http://freeipa.org for more info on the project