On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 04:48:15PM +0200, Timo Aaltonen wrote:
> On 07.01.2013 16:19, Colin Watson wrote:
> >I probably don't have much in the way of objection.  However, the only
> >SRU for sssd that's ever made it as far as -proposed was for bug 585885,
> >which failed the SRU process due to a lack of testers.  Do you have
> >plans for marshalling efforts to verify SRUs under an MRE such as this?
> Well, I do get asked about the new versions every now and then, so
> expect the folks requesting these to test them. So yes, after a new
> bugfix release has been released and pushed to the team PPA, it
> would get pushed as an official update if no issues have been found
> and tested again by those who need it. Things have changed a bit
> since the old, rejected SRU bug :)

OK, this seems fine then.  I've edited the MRE page to record that this
is an approved standing MRE.

Colin Watson                                       [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]

Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~freeipa
Post to     : freeipa@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~freeipa
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to