Al, it was bug in my code! sorry for the trouble :D avati On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 09:06:46AM -0700, Al Chu wrote: > > > Also when you say "subsequent ipmi calls fail" do you mean "return an > > > error" or "don't respond"? > > > > "return an error". ALL subsequent calls, both 2.0 calls and 1.x calls. > > I"m guessing probably the ipmi_device_t got 'closed' somehow? > > What's the completion code? > > Al > > -- > Albert Chu > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 925-422-5311 > Computer Scientist > High Performance Systems Division > Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory > >
_______________________________________________ Freeipmi-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freeipmi-devel
