Al,
it was bug in my code! sorry for the trouble :D
avati

On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 09:06:46AM -0700, Al Chu wrote:
> > > Also when you say "subsequent ipmi calls fail" do you mean "return an
> > > error" or "don't respond"?  
> > 
> > "return an error". ALL subsequent calls, both 2.0 calls and 1.x calls.
> > I"m guessing probably the ipmi_device_t got 'closed' somehow?
> 
> What's the completion code? 
> 
> Al
>  
> -- 
> Albert Chu
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 925-422-5311
> Computer Scientist
> High Performance Systems Division
> Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
> 
> 


_______________________________________________
Freeipmi-devel mailing list
Freeipmi-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freeipmi-devel

Reply via email to