Hey Bala, The issue is that this was a maintenance branch, so that code should have never been "cleaned up", if there were actually no bugs.
I still think we should still revert the code, so that the differences between the different releases are still kept to a minimum. Al On Fri, 2006-07-07 at 18:39 -0700, Bala.A wrote: > Hi Al, > > packet retransmission code is only in UDM. I did code cleanup in > ipmi_lan_sendto() and forgot to initialize packet_size variable. Because > of that, ipmi_lan_sendto() was failing. > > Thanks, > > Bala > --- > Free as in freedom > http://www.gnu.org/ > > > > On Fri, 2006-07-07 at 15:20 -0700, Anand Babu wrote: > >> This bug was introduced because of re-transmission feature. I thought, > >> that feature was required, so we fix the bug. > > > > These functions were nearly entirely re-written. I have no idea why. > > > > All retransmission code should only be in the UDM code. None of it > > should be in ipmi_lan_sendto(). The ipmi_lan_sendto() in 0.3.0 is still > > the same as the code in 0.2.0. > > > > Al > > > > -- > > Albert Chu > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > 925-422-5311 > > Computer Scientist > > High Performance Systems Division > > Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory > > > > > > -- Albert Chu [EMAIL PROTECTED] 925-422-5311 Computer Scientist High Performance Systems Division Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory _______________________________________________ Freeipmi-devel mailing list Freeipmi-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freeipmi-devel