Hey Holger, On Thu, 2009-12-17 at 17:12 +0100, Liebig, Holger wrote: > Hi Al, > > > > Interesting to see, that in the end dcmitool and the DCTS behave > > > differently. > > > > If Fujitsu has interpreted this way (partially b/c of DCTS), > > I think it's a good chance other companies have interpreted > > it this way too. So how about I make a special case. If you > > are configuring w/ set-power-limit, but you can't call > > get-power-limit, then the user must give values for all input > > fields (exception action, limit, time limit, etc.). > > > > I only had a quick check of your changes (busy with other stuff). > Our actual implementation of the get power limit returns a full set of > configuration parameters, just returned with the specific completion > code 0x80. The DCTS is also expecting a response of exact 14bytes. So > I think, the get before set approach is correct and not all parameters > need to be specified on the command line.
Wow. This was unexpected :-) I went ahead and (I think I) modified the code to handle all the circumstances. Will be out in the next beta. Al > Holger -- Albert Chu [email protected] Computer Scientist High Performance Systems Division Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory _______________________________________________ Freeipmi-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freeipmi-devel
