* Tejram Meena <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [11.12.2006 15:15]: > On Monday 11 December 2006 14:01, you wrote: > Thanks a lot for the latest patched port, All the earlier problem with > freeipmi are now sorted. This port is working fine on almost all IBM > machines(x series) i have tested, but ipmi-sensors have a problem on Intel > machine.
Thank You very much for your reports and testing! > > Intel Machine Specification: > SMBIOS 2.3 present > Base Board Product Name: SE7520JR23S > CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.00GHz (2992.51-MHz K8-class CPU) > Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0xf41 Stepping = 1 > > IPMI Device: Interface type: SSIF SSIF isn't supported with FreeIPMI on FreeBSD for now AFAIK :-( > > Kdump of ktrace of ipmi-sensors on INtel Machine: > 28780 ipmi-sensors RET read 4096/0x1000 > 28780 ipmi-sensors CALL close(0x3) > 28780 ipmi-sensors RET close 0 > 28780 ipmi-sensors CALL access(0x7fffffffe59f,0x7) > 28780 ipmi-sensors NAMI "/root" > 28780 ipmi-sensors RET access 0 > 28780 ipmi-sensors CALL open(0x520380,0,0x1b6) > 28780 ipmi-sensors NAMI > "/root/.freeipmi/sdr-cache/sdr-cache-app210.127.0.0.1" > 28780 ipmi-sensors RET open 3 > 28780 ipmi-sensors CALL fstat(0x3,0x7fffffffe9a0) > 28780 ipmi-sensors RET fstat 0 > 28780 ipmi-sensors CALL read(0x3,0x523000,0x1000) > 28780 ipmi-sensors GIO fd 3 read 0 bytes > "" > 28780 ipmi-sensors RET read 0 > 28780 ipmi-sensors CALL write(0x2,0x7fffffffe390,0x28) > 28780 ipmi-sensors GIO fd 2 wrote 40 bytes > "FAILED: _fread_record: Invalid argument > " I've seen these same errors with empty cache files. This is due to not checking enough for EOF in the code and is harmless. > 28780 ipmi-sensors RET write 40/0x28 > 28780 ipmi-sensors CALL close(0x3) > 28780 ipmi-sensors RET close 0 > 28780 ipmi-sensors CALL open(0x520380,0x601,0x1b6) > 28780 ipmi-sensors NAMI > "/root/.freeipmi/sdr-cache/sdr-cache-app210.127.0.0.1" > 28780 ipmi-sensors RET open 3 > 28780 ipmi-sensors CALL write(0x2,0x413e90,0x27) > 28780 ipmi-sensors GIO fd 2 wrote 39 bytes > "Fetching SDR repository information... " > 28780 ipmi-sensors RET write 39/0x27 > 28780 ipmi-sensors CALL semop(0x10003,0x8007aff06,0x1) > 28780 ipmi-sensors RET semop 0 > 28780 ipmi-sensors CALL nanosleep(0x7fffffffe890,0) > 28780 ipmi-sensors RET nanosleep 0 > 28780 ipmi-sensors CALL nanosleep(0x7fffffffe890,0) > 28780 ipmi-sensors RET nanosleep 0 > 28780 ipmi-sensors CALL nanosleep(0x7fffffffe890,0) > 28780 ipmi-sensors RET nanosleep 0 > 28780 ipmi-sensors CALL nanosleep(0x7fffffffe890,0) > 28780 ipmi-sensors RET nanosleep 0 > 28780 ipmi-sensors CALL nanosleep(0x7fffffffe890,0) > 28780 ipmi-sensors RET nanosleep 0 > 28780 ipmi-sensors CALL nanosleep(0x7fffffffe890,0) > 28780 ipmi-sensors RET nanosleep 0 > 28780 ipmi-sensors CALL nanosleep(0x7fffffffe890,0) > 28780 ipmi-sensors RET nanosleep 0 > > Note: It goes in a repeated loop , nanosleep due to some reason in both > ipmi-sensors and bmc-info. It does polling, checking for some condition each small fraction of time. That's OK, I think. > > Sorry for the late response, i was out for the weekend > Thanks > Tejram Meena > > > * Dmitry Frolov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [07.12.2006 12:20]: > > > Tejram, can You please try this port, it contains patch for another two > > > mentioned problems: > > > > > > http://kaya.nov.net/tmp/freeipmi-0.3.0_1-port.tar.gz > > > > Tejram, is there something new about that? I'm awaiting your response, > > to be sure the patch realy works. I have no amd64 test machine with IPMI > > to test this. > > > > If You can't test this port for some reason, please tell me, I'll > > just go ahead and ask developers to commit FreeBSD patch. wbr&w, dmitry. -- Dmitry Frolov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> RISS-Telecom Network, Novosibirsk, Russia [EMAIL PROTECTED], +7 383 2278800, DVF-RIPE _______________________________________________ Freeipmi-users mailing list Freeipmi-users@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freeipmi-users
