Dear Dimitry,
first, you are right, the property wasn't there causes the problem.
But why did you choose "false": this means that users are *not* asked if
they are choose the long node editor to edit a new node whether or not
to use rich text editing. It means that he always get the plain editor.
Empty means "ask", and "false" is don't use and "true" is use.
But I insist, that you wasn't asking yourself or me, what does your
change provoke and this is the problem.
Currently, I have to spend many time in looking that my functionalities
are still working and this is a problem.
>From my point of view, you are too fast with your "solutions" and in
this I agree with Dan, that it would be
better, if you test your changes more thouroughly.
Sorry, that I get angry, if you change something without getting to the
ground of the problem.
Examples: Patterns, Undo+Paste, this preference.
This said, I havn't included my problems with the design of your code
which is often not as I would like it to
be from the architectural view.
Next point: the project organization:
Dan is Director, I am Project Manager. Dan has problems as he isn't able
to guarantee that the next release is of sufficient quality.
And I do have problems to manage the project if you check in without
control.
If you don't agree with this structure, I would like you to discuss it
with us but currently you say, that we all are equal.
This can't be the case as then the project wouldn't be manageable, at
least not by me.
So, please tell me, if you accept the current "work share" or not or
what do you propose.
And: software development is mainly communication, and I would like you
to do more of this to improve the code quality and
the project situation.
Thanks, Chris
Dimitry Polivaev schrieb:
>> What went wrong?
>>
> Preferences Dialog could not be opened. We have got many requests but
> could not reproduce the problem. Ray has submitted following log:
>
> Exception in thread "AWT-EventQueue-0"
> java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Cannot set a boolean to null
> at
> freemind.common.ThreeCheckBoxProperty.setValue(ThreeCheckBoxProperty.java:108)
> at
> freemind.preferences.layout.OptionPanel.setProperties(OptionPanel.java:162)
> .....
>
> I have thought that the differences in auto.properties could be a
> reason. So I have removed my auto.properties and have seen that ptoperty
> remind_use_rich_text_in_new_long_nodes set to null course the troubles.
>
> I have used the standard solution: if the property is not found, put it
> into the property file.
>
>
>> Why did you change something without asking me thus removing a feature?
>> Dimitry, I don't want that you continue this way.
>>
>
> Chris, we have exactly the same rights and similar backgrounds. If you
> and Dan do not stop speaking to me like chefs, I shall leave the project
> and start my own one. Everyone have made some mistakes, and if you can
> not tolerate those of me, I shall not tolerate yours.
>
> Best regards, Dimitry
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
> Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
> Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
> Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
> _______________________________________________
> Freemind-developer mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freemind-developer
>
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
Freemind-developer mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freemind-developer
