> Oh! My mistake, the plugins/latex/Readme.txt is actually gpl v3 not lppl. > But that causes a similar problem in that all of the MPL 1.1 files are > not gpl v3 compliant in any way, even if the appropriate forms have been > filed for gpl v2 compliance.
And our SVG - Plugin requires batik which has Apache License, Version 2.0. It is not compatible with the pure GPL 2 . Further I would like to notice that the MPL 1.1 licensed files do not contain a java code. The xslt files are interpreted for performing the xslt transformation. The js - file is just extracted to the output directory during the transformation. They are contained in the jar files but they are not linked with the GPL code. So I am not sure if there is a problem. Dimitry ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Freemind-developer mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freemind-developer
