Hi Dimitry,
okay with me. Just that I would propose an alternative name for the group,
namely "FreeMind 0.9.0 - Out of scope".
See also http://freemind.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/Handling_trackers.
On further consideration, I understand that you want to label for yourself
these bugs that you are planning to fix. Isn't it easier to use the
"priority" field, as Eric has suggested some time ago? If you introduce an
"out of scope" group, you will have to mark a lot of bugs reported by users.
Anyway, as already said, a new group is okay with me. And it can be renamed
after it has been created if needed.
Dan
On Jan 29, 2008 8:57 AM, Dimitry Polivaev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It would still make sense that you look also at other bugs, especially
> > those reported by Ray, and use your judgment in deciding which of these
> > are serious, to be fixed.
>
> Indeed there are some other bugs which I find very relevant. In order to
> separate them from the others I would like to introduce a new group
> "FreeMind after 0.9.0" and move the less serious bugs not entered by you
> there.
>
> It would give us a clarity about what bug fixed are not relevant for the
> release.
>
> Do everybody agree?
>
> Dimitry
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Freemind-developer mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freemind-developer
