> Isn't it easier to use > the "priority" field, as Eric has suggested some time ago?
The name of the group "FreeMind 0.9.0" suggests that the all its bugs are to be fixed before the release. That's why prefer using of another group name to using priorities. > If you > introduce an "out of scope" group, you will have to mark a lot of > bugs reported by users. The already reported bugs can be easily marked using "Mass Update". I always read and evaluate the new bug reports, and I could assign the group after reading. But I do see a problem with bugs reported only on forum: even if I would copy them into the bug tracker (which also costs me time), the submitter do not expect them to be there and are not informed about the bug state. I have already written that from my point of view we should encourage the user to use the bug tracker instead of the forum for submitting the bug reports. In the other case such reports are very likely to be not noticed or forgotten. Dan, could you as a lead give your statement about it. Dimitry ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Freemind-developer mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freemind-developer
