Hi Dan,

according to your "main" issue:

> 1. Feedback on conversion
> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1820886&group_id=7118&atid=1006953
> This is the single most important outstanding issue. Users updating to
> the version 0.9.0 are not notified that their maps have been converted
> to a format that the version 0.8.0 cannot read. Either a warning
> should be implemented, one that appears per default, or an additional
> function should be added to FreeMind 0.9.0 that saves a mind map in
> the file format of 0.8.0; this could be one of the export functions.
> If such an export function were there, it would be no longer that
> critical that FreeMind does not warn about converting a mind map to an
> incompatible file format.
>   
I implemented (but not activated) the following warning:

really_convert_to_current_version=<html>This map was created with an 
older version of FreeMind. <br>Should it be converted (recommended)? 
<br>(Otherwise it is taken as it is without guarantee.) </html>

I can activate this warning without problems, but it is hard to change 
it (as all other translations are unchanged then).

If you have a very much better comment here, I can try to have a quick 
translation session.

According to the others, I wrote something below.

Regards, Chris


Dan Polansky schrieb:
> Hi Chris
>
> it is good to see a solid version of FreeMind 0.9.0, the version RC6.
> Many errors reported for the previous RCs have been fixed.
> Congratulations!
>
> There are nevertheless some issues open to which I would like to draw
> your attention. The issues that I have reported and are open are still
> available in the trackers:
>
> * http://freemind.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/Finishing_0.9.0
> ** 
> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=7118&atid=107118&status=1&submitter=danielpolansky&submit=Filter
> ** 
> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=7118&atid=1006953&status=1&submit=Filter
>
> I understand that you consider some of these issues to be of low
> priority, so I will pick those that I think are important and explain
> a bit why I think they are important.
>
>
> SELECTED BUGS
> =============
>
> Selected bugs, in the order of estimated priority:
>
> 1. Feedback on conversion
> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1820886&group_id=7118&atid=1006953
> This is the single most important outstanding issue. Users updating to
> the version 0.9.0 are not notified that their maps have been converted
> to a format that the version 0.8.0 cannot read. Either a warning
> should be implemented, one that appears per default, or an additional
> function should be added to FreeMind 0.9.0 that saves a mind map in
> the file format of 0.8.0; this could be one of the export functions.
> If such an export function were there, it would be no longer that
> critical that FreeMind does not warn about converting a mind map to an
> incompatible file format.
>
> 2. Zoom: no zooming effect on node editors
> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2800933&group_id=7118&atid=107118
> Zooming set for the mind map does not apply to the rich text node
> editor; the bug has been fixed in part, in that zooming at least
> applies correctly to plain text long node editor. On one hand, this
> does not cause a data loss, so is not of the absolutely utmost
> urgency. But it is a conspicuous usability error, one that makes the
> zoom fuction only half-usable in combination with rich text editing.
> Some of the users of the zoom function use it because small letters
> are tiring to their eyes; this can be especially true on some notebook
> displays with high PPI (pixel per inch). The bug is quite easy to fix;
> I do not have this bug in my personal version of FreeMind.
>
>   
I tried, but this bug isn't easy to fix IMHO. Perhaps in a future 
version of SimplyHTML.

> 3. Long node editor not below node
> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2540600&group_id=7118&atid=107118
> Long node editor is still sometimes opened above the node instead of
> below it. I have added to the bug a scenario that should make it
> easier to reproduce the bug. This is not a showstopper or a crash; it
> is an annoyance. How severe this annoyance is I am not sure. It is in
> any case an unneeded deviation from the behavior of FreeMind 0.8.0 and
> 0.7.1, one that should not therefore be too difficult to fix.
>
>   
I prefer not to change this now. I can look at it directly after 0.9.0, 
but as this is tricky inside Java to find its window and dialog positions,
I would like to have a longer testing phase with every constellation of 
monitors and screens.
> 4. Option for plain text in notes
> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1884362&group_id=7118&atid=1006953
> I do not really hope that you will implement an option for having
> plain text notes, but I am mentioning this anyway. This is a
> regression against FreeMind 0.8.0, one whose fixing has been requested
> by various people as documented in the tracker.
>
>   
Don't know. I don't think, that this is necessary. Perhaps, somebody 
implements it in the future.

> 5. Hyperlinks - opening not working in long nodes - 0.9.0 RC6
> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2908233&group_id=7118&atid=107118
> This is a minor issue, but it seems very easy to fix, and worth it. It
> suffices to add the handler for opening of hyperlinks that is added to
> rich text notes also to rich text nodes.
>
>   
Perhaps, Dimitry wants to look into it, but I prefer to leave it as it 
is for this version.
> There are more open issues that I have left out from this list,
> agreeing that they are likely either not all that important or too
> hard to fix and can be fixed after 0.9.0.
>
>
> PASSED TESTS
> ============
>
> I have tested the opening or following of various hyperlinks on my
> Vista machine, without having found any errors. I have not tested the
> network "//..." hyperlinks, though. There is a bug report in the bug
> tracker for the network hyperlinks in which you say that problems with
> their opening are fixed in Java 1.6.0. I assume that to be the case,
> otherwise the users of FreeMind 0.9.0 RC series would have likely
> complained.
>
> There were three data format errors that I have checked to no longer
> appear in FreeMind 0.9.0 RC6:
> * 
> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2844139&group_id=7118&atid=107118
> * 
> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2797009&group_id=7118&atid=107118
> * 
> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2705587&group_id=7118&atid=107118
>
> I have done no performance testing.
>
> I have done no further creative testing other than verifying whether
> the issues and bugs that I have already reported have been fixed.
>
> I have tried hard to consider what is important and what is secondary,
> and selected the bugs to report here accordingly.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Dan
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Join us December 9, 2009 for the Red Hat Virtual Experience,
> a free event focused on virtualization and cloud computing. 
> Attend in-depth sessions from your desk. Your couch. Anywhere.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/redhat-sfdev2dev
> _______________________________________________
> Freemind-developer mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freemind-developer
>
>   

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Join us December 9, 2009 for the Red Hat Virtual Experience,
a free event focused on virtualization and cloud computing. 
Attend in-depth sessions from your desk. Your couch. Anywhere.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/redhat-sfdev2dev
_______________________________________________
Freemind-developer mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freemind-developer

Reply via email to