On Fri, 18 Feb 2000, Phil Levis wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Feb 2000, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
>
> But Linux doesn't want to be Solaris; although it has progressed to a
> reasonable degree of complexity, decisions are still made favoring
> simplicity over functionality. For example, the threading model is notable
> because it is so simple to implement, as opposed to DEC UNIX's scheduler
> activations, or Solaris' LWP/thread multiplexing.
Emm.. in Linux 2.4, I've read, the multi-processor part is heavilly
increased en more supported, would this be an option for the idea Eelco
mentioned?
Or am I being stupid now :-)
Roel.
