Nick Bastin wrote:
> What's the state of CVS for docs? diffs are cool and all, but they can be
> fairly large for docs...
Not sure where you see a problem here ... Even with docs, you'll typically
have sections that stay more or the same from revision to revision, while
more work is done on others. So using CVS should be fine IMO ...
> Also, I was unable to actually check out anything in the repository because
> of an error authenticating. Either my username/password was bad
> (cvs:<blank>), or the repository name (plex86) wasn't any good. Any ideas?
Hmm. Those should work fine, I've just tried it again from here ..
Maybe it was just a temporary problem?
Bye,
Ulrich
--
Ulrich Weigand,
IMMD 1, Universitaet Erlangen-Nuernberg,
Martensstr. 3, D-91058 Erlangen, Phone: +49 9131 85-27688
