>Nick Bastin wrote:
>
>> What's the state of CVS for docs? diffs are cool and all, but they can be
>> fairly large for docs...
>
>Not sure where you see a problem here ... Even with docs, you'll typically
>have sections that stay more or the same from revision to revision, while
>more work is done on others. So using CVS should be fine IMO ...
The problem would be that I'd rather check stuff into CVS than send several
hundred K diffs to the mailing list, or to Kevin...hence the asking about
when the CVS tree would be up.
>> Also, I was unable to actually check out anything in the repository because
>> of an error authenticating. Either my username/password was bad
>> (cvs:<blank>), or the repository name (plex86) wasn't any good. Any ideas?
>
>Hmm. Those should work fine, I've just tried it again from here ..
>Maybe it was just a temporary problem?
It works now. Not sure what was up yesterday...
--
Nick Bastin
Software Developer
OPNET Technologies
