On Mon, 3 Apr 2000, Bryan Meredith wrote:

> Chris Emerson wrote:
> 
> > Is there a general consensus about what to apply for?  There hasn't
> > been any discussion on the topic for a few days.
> >
> > It sounds to me like we want a single char minor device for
> > /dev/plex86.  Now's the time to disagree - we don't want to have to
> > change later if we can help it.  Agreements also welcome, of course.
> > :-)
> 
> Why not just leave it dynamic???

Because that's really only a hack to use while developing.  Having
your own assigned number (major or minor) is how things are done.  If
nothing else, you don't really want to have to recreate /dev/plex86
every time you load the module.

Chris
-- 
Chris Emerson, obsessed Cambridge juggler
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web page: http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~cemerson/

Reply via email to