Kevin Lawton wrote.
> Bryan Meredith wrote:
> 
> > Agreed (but see the new devfs).
> > As we are still developing, how about using the hack until we are
> > absolutely certain about our requirements?
> > Maybe we will want a separate device for some other purpose at some time in
> > the future?
> > We cannot lose by waiting to see how things pan out and the scripts are as
> > easy to use as the current method of module insertion.
> 
> I have no problem with waiting.  Nothing is particularly urgent.
> 
> Let's see how things work out in the near future...

I agree with using dynamically allocated numbers for now.  The patch
is applied to current CVS.

Bye,
Ulrich

-- 
  Ulrich Weigand,
  IMMD 1, Universitaet Erlangen-Nuernberg,
  Martensstr. 3, D-91058 Erlangen, Phone: +49 9131 85-27688

Reply via email to