Kevin Lawton wrote.
> Bryan Meredith wrote:
>
> > Agreed (but see the new devfs).
> > As we are still developing, how about using the hack until we are
> > absolutely certain about our requirements?
> > Maybe we will want a separate device for some other purpose at some time in
> > the future?
> > We cannot lose by waiting to see how things pan out and the scripts are as
> > easy to use as the current method of module insertion.
>
> I have no problem with waiting. Nothing is particularly urgent.
>
> Let's see how things work out in the near future...
I agree with using dynamically allocated numbers for now. The patch
is applied to current CVS.
Bye,
Ulrich
--
Ulrich Weigand,
IMMD 1, Universitaet Erlangen-Nuernberg,
Martensstr. 3, D-91058 Erlangen, Phone: +49 9131 85-27688