On Wed, 27 Dec 2000, Mark J. Roberts wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Dec 2000, Scott Gregory Miller wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 27 Dec 2000, Mark J. Roberts wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, 27 Dec 2000, Scott Gregory Miller wrote:
> > >
> > > > I'd actually prefer forcing a mapfile to exist in an SVK subspace in order
> > > > to eliminate nesting a key in a key. Thats just ugly in my opinion. The
> > > > advantage to MSK@pubkey,mapname//document was that both mapname and
> > > > document are SSK documents residing under a common SVK public key. In
> > > > other workds, it was a way of defining two keys under one URI without
> > > > nasty embedding.
> > >
> > > And as I've said five times before, that also forbids guessable keys that
> > > have paths that work correctly. What users prefer is often not what
> > > programmers prefer. And users want simple guessable keys with no catches.
> > Thats why we have KSKs.
>
> No, it's not that simple, you can't just redirect from a KSK to a MSK. For
> one, it'll confuse the browser, and the links won't work. Among other
> reasons.
Not if you have browser support. Think forward a bit. I think that
FProxy needs to deal with this in the short term, but with browser plugins
in the long term this should be simple.
_______________________________________________
Freenet-dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev
