Brandon:
> > There also needs to be some way in the protocol that the shielded nodes
> > specifies that it wants to be shielded so that the proxy node can
> > differentiate between nodes that do and do not want to be shielded.
Scott:
> No, you still dont seem to get it. Shielded nodes have encrypted
> addresses with the shield node in the clear in their references. Any
> other node works as before.
Yeah, but the shield node still needs to know to forward messages to
shielded nodes.
So if the if the node on tcp/141.215.69.7:19114 gets a message for
tcp/141.215.69.7:19114/12345 it needs to recall that this is referring to
tcp/192.168.0.2:1876. So it has to keep a table matching the relative part
of a shielded address to an actual address.
There has to be some interaction between the shielded node and the shield
node so that this table entry can be established.
_______________________________________________
Freenet-dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev
