At 01:28 PM 8/9/2001 -0400, Eliezer Rodriguez Gonzalez wrote:

>Alan:
>
>Your advice about commenting out the use of semaphore.h in
>src/include/autoconf.h seemed to work,  now when I fire up ./radiusd -X
>it doesn't complain at all.
>
>I guess I don't have a thread enable daemon now. You told me it is use
>by the SQL  code.
>
>What is the real impact on not having a threads enable radiusd daemon ?

Performance.  A thread enabled server is able to handle a much greater
number of requests.

Also, the default behaviour is to use threads, so that is the configuration
that all the developer's use ( to my knowledge ).  It is possible that
some things may not be fully functional in the non-threaded version, as
that doesn't receive as much attention as the threaded version.

-Chris
--
    \\\|||///  \  Chris Parker    -    Manager, Development Engineering
    \ ~   ~ /   \       WX *is* Wireless!    \   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
    | @   @ |    \   http://www.starnetwx.net \      (847) 963-0116
oOo---(_)---oOo--\------------------------------------------------------
                   \ Without C we would have 'obol', 'basi', and 'pasal'


- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html

Reply via email to