�� �� ����, ��������?
�� � Sergey V. Sichevsky [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] �����:
>
> If I define it in in radcheck or radgroupcheck tables FreeRADIUS
> says:
[skip]
>
> rlm_sql: Pairs do not match [test]
>
You must wrote 'Simultaneous-Use = 1' into radreply (radgroupreply) also.
Some question for developer:
We have a different tables 'radcheck' - for check phase in authorizing
and 'radreply' - for send some attributes back to NAS.
Why we need compare 'request', 'check' and 'reply' attributes in paircmp()???
IMHO need compare request and check valuepairs only. May I stupid :) but
as I see in RFC2865/RFC2866 NAS don't require full back return from server
check attributes.
Some bugfix: insert into rlm_sql.c pairmove() befor paircmp() in line 279.
Or rewrite paircompare() in src/main/valuepair.c
Good. NAS require it. Next question: Why we use different tables???
IMHO more logical make 'radauthorize' table and wrote 'check' and
'reply' value pairs.
Best Wishes, Mag
P.S. I am very sorry, but letters to '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' without replies.
I have a patches fixing detecting PostgreSQL on FreeBSD-4.X and autorecconect
to PostgreSQL server. Also, some working to add T_OP_REG_EQ and other operators
in rlm_sql module (I need it for some checking like 'Calling-Station-Id' and
other :))
--
Nikolay P. Romanyuk - NR42-RIPE, NPR1-RIPN
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
