At 07:00 PM 2/11/2002 +0100, Rainer Clasen wrote:
>Hello,
>
>during my tests of Freeradius, I found a tiny annoyance when all servers
>for a realm are marked "dead":
>
>Although there are entries with an exact match (but marked dead), the
>DEFAULT entry is used.
>
>This is anoying when the DEFAULT entry points to a GRIC Radius server.
>
>Well, on the other hand I could imagine this being useful in certain
>cases so I'm not shure if this is a bug or a feature.

At some point, if all the servers for a realm are marked 'dead' they
should all be re-initialized and reattempted.  However, as you note,
it may be desired, so perhaps making it configurable is not a bad
option.

>Is there a need for a general, configurable solution or am I up to
>hacking this up myself?

Realm/proxy failover is still a newer feature.  You're probably best
off making changes to get it doing what you want, and posting a patch.
That will likely spark off some additional patches/work, as well.

Allowing for round-robin and failover as configurable options would be
good.  It currently only does failover ( and as you've noted, not
perfectly ).

Any additions/patches/etc would certainly be welcomed.  :)

-Chris
--
    \\\|||///  \  Chris Parker    -    Manager, Development Engineering
    \ ~   ~ /   \       WX *is* Wireless!    \   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
    | @   @ |    \   http://www.starnetwx.net \      (847) 963-0116
oOo---(_)---oOo--\------------------------------------------------------
                   \ Without C we would have 'obol', 'basi', and 'pasal'


- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html

- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html

Reply via email to