"Pierluigi Frullani" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  Looking in the code I think I' ve found a "bug" that I fixed this way:
...
> Brief, when entering in this lines, if the user was missing the Pool-Name
> attribute, there were no return and some unpredictable Pool address was
> returned.

  Ah, that's a problem.

> Is this correct.

  Yes.  I've added your patch, thanks.

  Alan DeKok.

- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html

Reply via email to