On Tue, 16 Jul 2002, Alan DeKok wrote:

> "Pierluigi Frullani" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >  Looking in the code I think I' ve found a "bug" that I fixed this way:
> ...
> > Brief, when entering in this lines, if the user was missing the Pool-Name
> > attribute, there were no return and some unpredictable Pool address was
> > returned.
>
>   Ah, that's a problem.

Well actually that was a design decision. If the Pool-Name attribute does not
exist then the first module instance in the authorize section will give out an
IP address. That way we have a default behaviour when the Pool-Name is missing.

>
> > Is this correct.
>
>   Yes.  I've added your patch, thanks.
>
>   Alan DeKok.
>
> -
> List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
>

--
Kostas Kalevras         Network Operations Center
[EMAIL PROTECTED]      National Technical University of Athens, Greece
Work Phone:             +30 10 7721861
'Go back to the shadow' Gandalf


- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html

Reply via email to