Brian Kolaci <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm using 0.6 and 0.7.1. One of the 0.6 versions works, > and one doesn't. The 0.7.1 doesn't. If it matters, the > version that is working uses Livingston & Cisco, whereas the > ones that don't work use CVX (which has very long port numbers). > But what doesn't make sense is that the values *are* in the > detail records. Can the long port number be stomping on the > framed-ip-address in the radutmp file?
No, but the long port numbers *may* get truncated in the radutmp file. Look at the source to be sure. Alan DeKok. - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
