01-Feb-03 at 12:18, Artur Hecker ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : > > Your point about commercial support is bang-on, though. The main > >reason I use free software is not because it's so much better than > >commercial software, and not because it's free. I use it because I > >can fix it when something goes wrong. When commercial software goes > >wrong, your only option is often to toss it, and install an open-source > >equivalent which isn't broken in quite the same way. > > since i don't quite understand the meaning of "bang-on" (*) i wanted to > point out that what you say corresponds exactly to what i said. with > open-source you always know what is wrong, at least theoretically (and > thus can fix it, once again, at least if you have the time and knowledge). > > i completely agree that costs and quality are not the main arguments > (and i never named those), especially because talking about something as > a radius server the decision is almost always carried out by people who > will hardly take the dollars out of their own pockets. > > (*) sounds like "bullshit" to me :-)
Wrong interpretation, diametrically opposed in fact... bang-on = dead right = 100% correct ~= tout � fait correct = pile sur le cible (?) ;-) -- |-Simon White, Internet Services Manager, Certified Check Point CCSA. |-MTDS Internet, Security, Anti-Virus, Linux and Hosting Solutions. |-MTDS 14, rue du 16 novembre, Agdal, Rabat, Morocco. |-MTDS tel +212.3.767.4861 - fax +212.3.767.4863 - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
