Graeme Hinchliffe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The only time I saw pauses (of about .5 of a second) was when > messages like "Sleeping for 3" appeared, the server never seemed to > pause waiting for a responce or other such item.
That shouldn't be a problem. > Also when running -X the server isn't running threadded is it? hence > if there is a problem with the thread code this would not show it? Yes. > At present the servers seem to service requests quite happily, but > the number of threads creeps up and up until it hits the upper limit > regardless of what timeouts I set or requests per server settings I > set. And this is the case when under a low load with only around 5 > requests a second. Then something's wrong. > And the only modification I have made to the code was to stop it > sending out reject messages when the db is not present (which it > hasn't run), essentially hardcoding the 'handled' behaviour into our > daemons. Hmm... try reproducing it with an unmodified version of the server. Your patches may have broken it, in which case I'm not sure how I can help you. Alan DeKok. - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
