Stephen Fulton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > No one person should be expected to answer all the questions in > detail. What I'm asking is that the answers are effective.
Then pay for effective answers. It's as simple as that. > That's a fallacy, and you know it. If the technical support is sub-par, it > is less than free, it is worthless (or even harmful!). And for the record, > I do not consider mailing lists (and other discussion groups, like forums) > "technical support", especially for open-source projects. See the list archives. Many people have commented publicly that this list yields better technical support than they've had for commercial products. > ... it doesn't hurt to have higher standards. Higher standards (or ANY standards at all) are pointless if no one submits work. Your statement is a snide attack on the developers of the server, and the authors of the documentation. It's inappropriate. > If someone has been struggling to overcome a problem for some time, > and that person looks for guidance, then that person should not be > marginalized. I marginalized you by *answering* your questions? Or maybe I marginalized you because my answer asked you to do some work? > But it is a circular problem, if we don't know what the problem is, > how can we write about it? I hope that you would eventually figure out the answer, at which point you can write about it. > I'll send you the URL, provide you with moderator status (and anyone > else you deem). I've populated some of it already, but I must get > back to work now. Ok. Alan DeKok. - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
