> > DEFAULT Service-Type == Framed-User, Pool-Name := "main_pool" > > Framed-MTU = 1500, > > Service-Type = Framed-User, > > Fall-Through = 1, > > Ascend-IP-Pool-Definition = "1 111.222.333.97 93"
> As far as I understand, an Ascend-Pool def is not needed in the > described setup. If the radius assigns IPs, the MAX does not need a > pool, just route the IPs to it. Actually Ascend-IP-Pool-Definition has been there since my early tests and hasn't been removed by a mistake. > On the other hand: why not just let the MAX distribute the IPs? make a > pools-NAS-NAME entry which assigns your pools to the NAS and choose > the pool via the Ascend-Assign-IP-Pool attribute. Works fine (I have > about a dozend MAX 2000/4000/6000/TNT with this setup). So let me see if I get this straight. I should create something like: pools-nas1 Ascend-Assign-IP-Pool := "nas1_pool" ? I don't know if I understood exactly what you mean. I've never worked with ascend before. If however it's pretty much the above has this anything to do with the countless auth requests regarding pools-nas1/ascend I receive or have I screwed everything badly? :-) > Oliver. Regards, Paris - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
