> > > On the other hand: why not just let the MAX distribute the IPs?
make a
> > > pools-NAS-NAME entry which assigns your pools to the NAS and
choose
> > > the pool via the Ascend-Assign-IP-Pool attribute. Works fine (I
have
> > > about a dozend MAX 2000/4000/6000/TNT with this setup).
> > 
> > So let me see if I get this straight. I should create something
like:
> > 
> > pools-nas1 Ascend-Assign-IP-Pool := "nas1_pool" ?

> No.

> Example (makes three pools on nas1 and has 3 test users which each get
> an ip from a different pool):

> pools-nas1    Auth-Type := Local, User-Password == "ascend"
>       Service-Type = Outbound-User,
>       Ascend-IP-Pool-Definition = "1 10.10.10.1 126",
>       Ascend-IP-Pool-Definition = "2 10.10.20.1 126",
>       Ascend-IP-Pool-Definition = "3 10.10.30.1 126"

> user1 Auth-Type := Local, User-Password == "test1"
>       Service-Type = Framed,
>       Framed-Protocol = MPP,
>       Ascend-Maximum-Channels = 2,
>       Ascend-Assign-IP-Pool = 1,
>       Ascend-Idle-Limit = 3600,
>       Ascend-Client-Primary-DNS = 10.1.1.1,
>       Ascend-Client-Secondary-DNS = 10.2.1.1,
>       Ascend-Client-Assign-DNS = DNS-Assign-Yes
>
> user2 Auth-Type := Local, User-Password == "test2"
>       Service-Type = Framed,
>       Framed-Protocol = MPP,
>       Ascend-Maximum-Channels = 2,
>       Ascend-Assign-IP-Pool = 2,
>       Ascend-Idle-Limit = 3600,
>       Ascend-Client-Primary-DNS = 10.1.1.1,
>       Ascend-Client-Secondary-DNS = 10.2.1.1,
>       Ascend-Client-Assign-DNS = DNS-Assign-Yes

> user3 Auth-Type := Local, User-Password == "test3"
>       Service-Type = Framed,
>       Framed-Protocol = MPP,
>       Ascend-Maximum-Channels = 2,
>       Ascend-Assign-IP-Pool = 3,
>       Ascend-Idle-Limit = 3600,
>       Ascend-Client-Primary-DNS = 10.1.1.1,
>       Ascend-Client-Secondary-DNS = 10.2.1.1,
>       Ascend-Client-Assign-DNS = DNS-Assign-Yes

> This works well with fallback defaults / sql group replies.

I see. I will forward these changes to see whether the problems are
totally solved and let you know of the outcome. This hole issue with the
IP Pools has been in my mind since I first started working along with
Radius.

> > I don't know if I understood exactly what you mean. I've never
worked 
> > with ascend before. If however it's pretty much the above has this 
> > anything to do with the countless auth requests regarding 
> > pools-nas1/ascend I receive or have I screwed everything badly? :-)

> Oh, missed that paragraph...

> Yep. pool defs must go to the pools user of the nas. As soon as the
max 
> powers up, it asks for its pools. If it gets a user reply which has a 
> unknown pool, it should ask again.

Another helpful tip. Browsing the archives this subject had been
mentioned before but the answer was simply to put this user in
Service-Type = REJECT to avoid the logging of these connections. Let
along the manuals of the NAS equipment have been lost through the
centuries making my life much more difficult :-)

> I don't trust freeradius to assign IP addresses, cause the NAS is the
one > who knows if a session is there or if it is not. There is no real
point in > letting the radius assign ip adresses if your NAS equipment
can do it. And > if you are changing pools often, this is also no
problem if your running 
> some sort of dynamic routing protocol, cause the nas will announce
it's 
> learned pools via this way...

Well you may actually be correct but from what I have read during the
past months some NAS equipment didn't have any problems with the ip
management via the radius server so I though this should be a most
applicable method to setup radius.

> Oliver.

Thank you very much for all your help.

Regards, 
Paris




- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html

Reply via email to