Well poop...
 

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob
McCormick
Sent: Friday, April 23, 2004 5:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Cisco 1100 AP and XP Client using tls (PEAP) 

If your not getting an IP it's still not working...  The only times I've had
that problem it was because I wasn't actually getting authenticated.  For
some reason stupid XP and 2k will sometimes still say your connected.  I
don't know why.


On Apr 23, 2004, at 3:59 PM, Clayton Dukes wrote:

> Well, I have it working, at least it appears to be, but I am still not 
> getting an ip on the laptop -- do I need to pass the dhcp server 
> somewhere?
> Sorry if I don't understand this stuff as well as you do, please be 
> patient with me.
>
>
>
>
> rad_recv: Access-Request packet from host 216.139.200.5:59452, id=49,
> length=147
>         User-Name = "cdukes"
>         Framed-MTU = 1400
>         Called-Station-Id = "000f.8f76.2e20"
>         Calling-Station-Id = "0006.25a9.8594"
>         Message-Authenticator = 0xf7b2bde25d17ea027b4f0b283a60cdae
>         EAP-Message = 0x0202000b016364756b6573
>         NAS-Port-Type = Wireless-802.11
>         NAS-Port = 378
>         State = 0x92f333abdd073fa963f08d534129f7a4
>         Service-Type = Framed-User
>         NAS-IP-Address = 10.100.10.10
>         NAS-Identifier = "ap-noc"
>   Processing the authorize section of radiusd.conf
> modcall: entering group authorize for request 4
>   modcall[authorize]: module "preprocess" returns ok for request 4
>   modcall[authorize]: module "chap" returns noop for request 4
>   modcall[authorize]: module "mschap" returns noop for request 4
>     rlm_realm: No '@' in User-Name = "cdukes", looking up realm NULL
>     rlm_realm: No such realm "NULL"
>   modcall[authorize]: module "suffix" returns noop for request 4
>   rlm_eap: EAP packet type response id 2 length 11
>   rlm_eap: No EAP Start, assuming it's an on-going EAP conversation
>   modcall[authorize]: module "eap" returns updated for request 4
>     users: Matched DEFAULT at 152
>     users: Matched DEFAULT at 171
>     users: Matched cdukes at 215
>   modcall[authorize]: module "files" returns ok for request 4
> modcall: group authorize returns updated for request 4
>   rad_check_password:  Found Auth-Type EAP
> auth: type "EAP"
>   Processing the authenticate section of radiusd.conf
> modcall: entering group authenticate for request 4
>   rlm_eap: EAP Identity
>   rlm_eap: processing type tls
>  rlm_eap_tls: Requiring client certificate
>   rlm_eap_tls: Initiate
>   rlm_eap_tls: Start returned 1
>   modcall[authenticate]: module "eap" returns handled for request 4
> modcall: group authenticate returns handled for request 4 Sending 
> Access-Challenge of id 49 to 216.139.200.5:59452
>         Framed-IP-Address = 255.255.255.254
>         Framed-MTU = 576
>         Service-Type = Framed-User
>         EAP-Message = 0x010300060d20
>         Message-Authenticator = 0x00000000000000000000000000000000
>         State = 0x45e0bb69aebe14a82b34c32a696e3a8f
> Finished request 4
> Going to the next request
> Waking up in 6 seconds...
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alan 
> DeKok
> Sent: Friday, April 23, 2004 4:31 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Cisco 1100 AP and XP Client using tls (PEAP)
>
> "Clayton Dukes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Sorry, I must have misunderstood. Forgive me...If I turn off LDAP in 
>> the authenticate section,
>
>   Did I say to do that?  No.  Go back and read what I said.
>
>   If you're retrieving passwords from the LDAP directory, then setting 
> Auth-Type := LDAP is not only redundant, it ensures that CHAP, 
> MS-CHAP, and PEAP authentication won't ever work.  In addition, it 
> increases the load on your LDAP server, for no point.
>
>   If you're not retrieving passwords from LDAP, then CHAP, MS-CHAP, 
> and PEAP won't *ever* work.  Only PAP authentication will work.
>
>   Don't set Auth-Type := LDAP.
>
>   Please READ my responses, and don't read into them your 
> interpretation of what you think I meant to say.
>
>   Alan DeKok.
>
> -
> List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See
> http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
>
>
> 
>
>
>
>
> -
> List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See
> http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
>

- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See
http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


!DSPAM:40898422269973436761932!




- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html

Reply via email to