On Wed, 2 Jun 2004, Hugo Chasqueira wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> (Please ignore any duplicates of this message)
>
> Hi,
>
> Someone is confronting me to choose between freeradius and another radius
> server.
>
> They claim the other radius server works better than freeradius. Their claims
> are the following:
>
> * Freeradius doesn't allow using Microsoft Active Directory as a source of
> user data.

Not true.

> * Freeradius doesn't support PEAP (used by Windows XP SP1).

Supported in latest snapshots and in 1.0

> * Freeradius doesn't support EAP/TTLS (with PAP) using Alfa Ariss Windows
> Supplicant.

Supported in latest snapshots and in 1.0. I 've tested it myself with this
configuration and it works just fine.

>
> I don't think these claims are correct, i've stopped experimenting with
> freeradius since version 0.9.3.
>
> Can anyone tell me if any of this claims are true?
>
>
> - --
>
> Hugo Chasqueira
>
> Public Key:
> http://search.keyserver.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x8BD14B82
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFAveRmjFeRi4vRS4IRAgQCAKCU37FhdrQu7YUTwqBsiSFAalXj3gCeOSrT
> 7GDCWMs1SvwJCpBUxvc/n7s=
> =OkUx
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> -
> List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
>

--
Kostas Kalevras         Network Operations Center
[EMAIL PROTECTED]       National Technical University of Athens, Greece
Work Phone:             +30 210 7721861
'Go back to the shadow' Gandalf

- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html

Reply via email to