Guy Fraser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have been quietly watching this thread, and the idea of setting up
> a FIFO {First In First Out} buffer to handle inserts sounds like a
> good idea, but may have some adverse consequences.Like losing requests if the server goes down. If the requests are on disk, the "detail" file acts like a FIFO, and is permanent storage. > Another option might be setting up a customizable delay into the > acknowledge response from the radius server. This is sometimes referred > to as a delay pool, and is used for connection throttling in squid > and apache if I remember correctly. I'm not sure that this would work for RADIUS. The NAS is getting 10^4 people logging in at the same time, and slowing down the response for person A won't change the speed of the accounting requests for person B. Alan DeKok. - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
