On Thu, 24 Jun 2004, Alan DeKok wrote: > Kostas Kalevras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > * Apr 2004, Kostas Kalveras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > - Add a per instance Ldap-Group attribute (of the form > > <instance>-Ldap-Group) and register > > a corresponding ldap_groupcmp function > > > > > > So in other words, it's in there already... > > Ah. But the module still registers a callback for LDAP-Group, even > if one already exists. That should probably be double-checked...
The only way for the ldap module to know if ldap-group has been registered is to keep a ldap_group_registered value. In any case the ldap module which will be instantiated last will be the one that will handle ldap-group comparisons. If we add a check that will change to the first ldap module which is instantiated. I think it's more or less a matter of personal taste, which module we 'd like to handle ldap-group comparisons. Is it really worth the effort. Users can just change the order in which the ldap modules are instantiated in order to achieve what they want. > > Alan DeKok. > > > - > List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html > -- Kostas Kalevras Network Operations Center [EMAIL PROTECTED] National Technical University of Athens, Greece Work Phone: +30 210 7721861 'Go back to the shadow' Gandalf - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
