Adam Shelley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I was just wondering, would this type of setup still be vulnerable to this: > > http://asleap.sourceforge.net/ > > Should LEAP be used in any production environment to ensure security on > wireless links?
It's no more vulnerable than MS-CHAP, except that MS-CHAP isn't used in wireless sessions. EAP-TTLS or EAP-PEAP are preferred for wireless. Alan DEKok. - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
